本当にヤバい話が飛び出します。【 都市伝説 シンジラレナイハナシ 5周年 】







uap_5_m (7)

sunprint-05.jpg

#UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film*

The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably
a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it.

At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere
like a force field is formed. # UAP

The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown.
This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome.

#UAP announced by the US Department of Defense
A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally?
Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center?
A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object.
https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ


Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by
the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more,
you can expect new information.

ggICT0008.jpg

ffキャプチャ

ffPICT0053.jpg

ffPICT0005.jpg

img005.jpg

img003.jpg

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
by the way・・
When the camera was still in the analog era
Kodachrome film came out w
I knew there was ...
There was no film scanner. To be exact,
There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww
Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww
Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen?
Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.

In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO
But found ww
When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ...
However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ...
UFO is clear ... ww
When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww



+++++++++++++++++++++


2024/05/02(木) 19:10 UNARRANGEMENT PERMALINK COM(0)
続5/4大停電…







uap_5_m (7)

IMG_20220909_221859.jpg

UAP0011.png


#UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film*

The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably
a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it.

At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere
like a force field is formed. # UAP

The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown.
This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome.

#UAP announced by the US Department of Defense
A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally?
Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center?
A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object.
https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ


Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by
the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more,
you can expect new information.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
by the way・・
When the camera was still in the analog era
Kodachrome film came out w
I knew there was ...
There was no film scanner. To be exact,
There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww
Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww
Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen?
Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.

In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO
But found ww
When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ...
However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ...
UFO is clear ... ww
When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww

ggICT0008.jpg

ffキャプチャ

ffPICT0053.jpg

ffPICT0023.jpg

ffPICT0021.jpg

ffPICT0005.jpg

bbキャプチャ

a123.png

2024/05/02(木) 14:40 UNARRANGEMENT PERMALINK COM(0)