・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ If you tweet a real UFO picture to a UFO researcher... most of them don't show any interest lol. So does that mean most researchers are fakes? Real UFO pictures are useful for exposing fake researchers lol. :://////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Why are there no UFO images in the world? o Cameras themselves have switched to digital, and their performance has deteriorated drastically compared to film cameras lol o Considering the probability of photographing a UFO, you don't make any money from it lol If you had to put a price on it, it would be about 100 million yen per shot lol
>Pigment photography production is surprisingly . However, as there are many variable elements, like the normal picture, you can not always make the same thing. That's where the interest is divided. This is a photo illustration to the last. It is not computer graphics either. The ultimate goal is the original vintage print.
Modern pictures are completed with digital data on the computer. Classical technique photography consists of an amalog camera, film, and finally on paper
My blog is simple and rudimentary. I just copy the ivy content in one place to another blog. for example,
https://magicmoon2007.blogspot.com/
The composition is YOUTUBE video link, original photo, Three points of the original text. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ UAP experiment Part 1. Is it real if UFO researchers react to real UAP images? Mostly fake and government-intentioned? ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
＃UFO #UAP @ UFOs operate in the electromagnetic domain, invisible to the human eye. Older cameras can capture the infrared region, which is part of that electromagnetic spectrum.
。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
UFOs are difficult to see with the naked eye, In the age of film cameras, UFOs could be photographed, Is it no longer possible to shoot UFOs with digital cameras? That's because digital cameras are equipped with powerful IR cut filters.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ Infrared light has the characteristic of being easier to pass through the spatial absorption band than visible light, so it is effective for grasping UFOs hidden behind it..
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ If you tweet a real UFO picture to a UFO researcher... most of them don't show any interest lol. So does that mean most researchers are fakes? Real UFO pictures are useful for exposing fake researchers lol. :://////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Why are there no UFO images in the world? o Cameras themselves have switched to digital, and their performance has deteriorated drastically compared to film cameras lol o Considering the probability of photographing a UFO, you don't make any money from it lol If you had to put a price on it, it would be about 100 million yen per shot lol
Vintage photos are mostly monochrome, with very few color prints.
In the case of color, it will be faded after 30 years. Therefore,
I made organic pigments as color formers. Moreover, the dot type will be the world's first.
########
# To negative film, but you need a dark room ... # On a PC, it is possible that the negative film, made with ink-jet printing output. # Thus, no longer cumbersome darkroom work, # All, you can work in a bright room. Since # pigmented photosensitive solution is changed in light and temperature, # The storage, need a refrigerator.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Even with UAP, sharp images will not come out w You are cheated by infrared shadow puppets w
UAP's powerful weapon is the force field from objects. Even if a submarine collides, it will not break.
US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++
